Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger is known for the phrase “The total number of minds in the universe is one. In fact, consciousness is a singularity phasing within all beings.” which best summarizes his philosophical outlook on the nature of reality. The phrase implies that the apparent multiplicity of minds is just an illusion and that there is only one mind, or one consciousness, that expresses itself in a myriad of ways. In such a world view, a separation between subject and object does not exist, there is no existence of a subject on the one side and perception of an object on the other. In a world without the subject-object split, we are all an expression of the one.

Schrödinger also stated that “consciousness cannot be accounted for in physical terms. For consciousness is absolutely fundamental. It cannot be accounted for in terms of anything else”. This reflects the idea of panpsychism, the view that all existence is permeated by consciousness and that consciousness is the underlying reality – rather than just something that is produced by brains of a certain complexity.

The fundamental idea that there is no separation of self, that ego is an illusion, has many implications when applied to relationships or real-life challenges of the modern age. For example, the idea that climate change is ‘out there’; or that poverty and war and violence are ‘out there’, and that ‘I as an individual’ have nothing to do with it, quickly melts away. Rather, these aspects of human society represent the very shadow of what, collectively speaking, ‘I the individual’ believe to be a separate, totally OK, clinically pure entity. In truth, these symptoms are all manifestations of the one (human) consciousness. In a negotiation, ‘the other’ is also an expression of the one consciousness, just like myself. It becomes clear that this vision has deep spiritual implications and affects the way one sees everyday life, providing an acute sense of the interconnectedness and wholeness, even holiness, of all life, in whatever form it may appear. In line with Schrödinger’s basic tenet, we are simply all a part of one greater ecology, of the one web of life.

As a quantum physicist, Erwin Schrödinger came up with the famous ‘Schrödinger’s Cat’ thought experiment that raises profound questions about reality – exemplified by the state of an imagined cat in a box that according to the experiment, is dead and alive at the same time until observed – and the role of the observer in the outcome. Studying this experiment – that revolves around the principle of quantum superposition – is a door opener to the deep philosophical implications raised both by Erwin Schrödinger’s work and quantum physics in general.

Quantum weirdness: Schrödinger’s Cat Explained

The observer effect in quantum physics confronts us with the thought-provoking notion that the mere observation of a phenomenon changes that phenomenon; in other words, that through the very act of watching, the observer affects the observed reality – an idea that questions the assumption of an objective world out there that operates in a totally independent way. Instead, experiments suggest that the act of observation “forces” subatomic particles – like photons or electrons – to act like particles and not like waves. The question arises: What does observation have to do with anything? In physics?!

According to the Many Worlds Interpretation of quantum mechanics, Schrödinger’s Cat dies in one universe, but lives on in another. – Image: Wikicommons

Taking this one step further, Schrödingers Gedankenexperiment, as it is called in German, can be regarded as a pioneering attempt to study the observer effect when going from the subatomic, or quantum realm (where the observer effect has been by proven by experiment many times) to the macroscopic world that we are familiar with from everyday experience. Intriguingly, more recent real-life experiments have demonstrated that even some macroscopic objects can show this bizarre quantum behavior under certain conditions, underlining the fact that the visionary icon of physics Schrödinger early on asked the right – and profound – questions about the nature of reality.

Pssst, animal lovers: Note that no cat ever got harmed in these experiments – not in this world nor in any other.

 

You may also like:

Destination Austria: Travel Resources
How to enhance your creativity
Bremen Space Year celebrates the aerospace industry
Odessa is the Ukrainian gateway for travel to the Danube Delta
Destination Spain: Travel Resources

Articles
Home

Erwin Schrödinger: There is only one mind

11 thoughts on “Erwin Schrödinger: There is only one mind

  • December 7, 2020 at 10:16 am
    Permalink

    This reflects the idea of idealism, not panpsychism.

    Reply
    • February 4, 2021 at 10:22 pm
      Permalink

      1 God controlling the whole experiment

      Reply
      • September 8, 2022 at 11:33 pm
        Permalink

        Consciousness or awareness is the Self. Try to think or even imagine anything in this universe without you being there. This is what Sanatana Dharma (or currently being called as Hinduism) expounds in great detail in the revealing text called the “Vedas” precisely at the end portion called the “Vedanta”. In a way, you (or the Self) are the one who is controlling this whole experiment 🙂

        Reply
      • April 29, 2023 at 11:43 pm
        Permalink

        God IS the experiment, for there is nothing else.

        Reply
    • April 22, 2021 at 6:17 pm
      Permalink

      It’s far more than idealism. It suggests a reality of the “non-local mind.” As Sir James Jeans wrote “the Universe begins to look like a great thought instead of a great machine. Mind no longer appears to be an accidental intruder into the realm of matter… we ought rather hail it as the creator and governor of the realm of matter.”

      Reply
  • September 28, 2022 at 5:52 pm
    Permalink

    Is the cat an observer, and if not, why not?

    Reply
  • October 13, 2023 at 3:57 pm
    Permalink

    Shrodinger, as other philosophers in history believed that there is one mind, but a real philosopher can connect with this mind to understand what reality is. Other philosophers who recognized this fact belong to all cultures,not just the western culture. In the west we can see this idea implicitly inKant,s philosophy and in Heagl,s and in Neitzshe and others

    Reply
  • April 4, 2024 at 11:21 am
    Permalink

    Is it actually panpsychism? I thought that was simply the belief that everything is conscious to a greater or lesser extent, whereas Shrödinger seems more explicit – that everything ARISES from consciousness.
    There was a fascinating talk fairly recently on Radio 4’s ‘In Our Time’ (still available on BBC Sounds) which discussed the difference between panpsychism, animism and pantheism. Regrettably, nobody mentioned panentheism (which has always made the most sense to me.)

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *